3 ms·

"a couple of months" ... why not immediately?

• papandada 4y ago
  Funnily enough, the interview fraud (I wasn't a part of that) only got brought up after he was gone. Between being at a very passive government client, plus company culture, it's almost more amazing that he was able to burn bridges at a place people spent years accomplishing nothing. edit: I briefly doubted myself, but I checked on his LinkedIn and he has it listed as a 6-month engagement in 2013, with a significant gap until the next role. Even mentioned him to my wife in chats during that time span.
  • frellus 4y ago
    ouch.. this sort of makes me think of Office Space for some reason. "I looked into it more deeply and I found that apparently what happened is that he was laid off five years ago and no one ever told him, but through some kind of glitch in the payroll department, he still gets a paycheck." "So we just went ahead and fixed the glitch." "So um, Milton has been let go?" "Well just a second there, professor. We uh, we fixed the glitch. So he won't be receiving a paycheck anymore, so it will just work itself out naturally." "We always like to avoid confrontation, whenever possible. Problem solved from your end."