4 ms·
It’s not a conspiracy theory. Some group conspired to sabotage the pipelines. It’s a conspiracy fact. The only theoretical aspect is who did it and that’s mo
by sudden_dystopia 4y ago
It’s not a conspiracy theory. Some group conspired to sabotage the pipelines. It’s a conspiracy fact. The only theoretical aspect is who did it and that’s more of a hypothesis at this point. It’s a conspiracy hypothesis.
- Bud 4y agoCould we please have at least a shred of evidence of sabotage before we move on to the phase where we conclude there was sabotage? Sorry to be a stickler about major geopolitical crises.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- FollowingTheDao 4y agoTwo pipelines bust at once on Nord 1 and 2? https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/sep/27/nord-stream-1-2-pipelines-leak-baltic-sabotage-fears https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/sep/27/nord-stream...
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- krisoft 4y agoThere are 3 separate but simultaneous "accidents" on the pipelines. Do you have a proposal which would explain that and not involve sabotage?
- bobowzki 4y agoThey could have been fitted with explosives before for some reason and it was triggered by accident.
- 2-718-281-828 4y agobut it's a theory as of now and hence a "conspiracy theory". I'd like to mention that for me "conspiracy theory" is not a term I frown upon. It's been labelled as something equivalent to "dangerous tin foil hat bullshit" by some politicians and news outlets who'd like us to believe that history unfolds linearly and obviously.
- Invictus0 4y ago"For me the word doesn't mean what everyone else thinks it means"
- 2-718-281-828 4y agonice try, buddy ;)