4 ms·
I see this type of comment all the time, you are vastly underestimating the skill required to do the thing you hypothesize. Spend 15 minutes walking through th
by mox1 4y ago
I see this type of comment all the time, you are vastly underestimating the skill required to do the thing you hypothesize.
Spend 15 minutes walking through the scenario, there is a lot that can go wrong with your simple plan.
Of course it is possible, but you would need to find the intersection of
1. Willing / Desire to blow up the pipeline
2. Have the skills to create an underwater bomb of correct properties to blow up a pipeline.
1 & 2 is not "Anybody". Its a relatively small set of the worlds population, probably someone with mining skills, engineering skills, probably diving skills and/or former military.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- timonoko 4y agoNo worries. I already revised my plan. I would 3D-print Raspberry-based submersible, which would find sea bottom and then proceed South-East from Suuri-Pisi and magnetically recognize metallic oblong object. Only problem is the availability of explosive material. But maybe I can buy bombs from immigrant gangs of Stockholm....
- 4gotunameagain 4y agoIf you think that building an autonomous 3d printed submarine with underwater navigation and pipeline detection is the easy part and creating the explosives the hard one, then I think you should do more research on both topics :)
- timonoko 4y agoCome on son. I replaced tube-based Russian missile control with 8080 microprocessor while in the Finnish Army 1978. Rumour is that this solution was field-tested in Afghanistan when Russians made KR580VM80A-processor.
- 4gotunameagain 4y ago> Come on son. Haha clap clap mate, and I am an aerospace engineer in 2022, I know what I'm talking about too. I have programmed an 8051 in assembly too, old guy It is not 1978 anymore