2 ms·

Nakamura analysing “most incriminating evidence against Hans Niemann” [video]

• nomilk 4y ago
  I haven't watched the full video yet, but some interesting observations so far: - 7m 20s: Context on metric used (note that Feller was confirmed cheating): https://i.imgur.com/jgaCLc4.png https://i.imgur.com/jgaCLc4.png - 12m 20s. (paraphrasing) A clinically perfect game (by Carlsen) is still only 79% - 17m 10s Naka's 2 best games to analyse on chessbase - 20m Naka says Hans's analysis of one game (not against Carlsen) was "ridiculous" - 24m 30s "once you see (a good move) you can't unsee it ... but until you see it, it's not obvious at all" - 27m 30s - "Fischer had 0 games at 100% in his entire career"
  • JacobThreeThree 4y ago
    For comparison, what was Hans' percentage?
    • deleted 4y ago
      [deleted]
    • nomilk 4y ago
      (in order of appearance in the video) - 72% (17m 30s) Against Mishra ("for many people it was a most suspicious game"). Naka: "this is a good performance but it's not insane". Yosha: "nothing too suspicious" - 100% (21m 15s) - Several more 100% (from ~25m)