3 ms·
I believe you are conflating patents and trademarks. Patents require novelty to be accepted. Trademarks do not. As it happens, there are many registered tradem
by jacques_chester 4y ago
I believe you are conflating patents and trademarks. Patents require novelty to be accepted. Trademarks do not.
As it happens, there are many registered trademarks and variants of trademarks for "computer system": https://trademarks.justia.com/search?q=computer+system https://trademarks.justia.com/search?q=computer+system
- rektide 4y agoIm not conflating. I think the law is debasing itself by failing to set a reasonable minimum bar for what can be trademarked. This feels like a case where the law should recognize the self obviousness of two terms smashed together.