4 ms·

For the conspiracy theorists claiming this is the US... The current US administration has made climate change it's number one priority. It's extremely doubtful

For the conspiracy theorists claiming this is the US... The current US administration has made climate change it's number one priority. It's extremely doubtful they would damage the environment in this way with methane.

voakbasda 4y ago
Good thing politicians are never duplicitous liars. We can trust them to do exactly what they say and know they will never dare betray their constituents.
aa-jv 4y ago
- JumpCrisscross 4y ago
  > Biden even announced he'd do it Looking at your recent comment history, it’s difficult to take these claims seriously, given their repetition and wrongness. But in the effort of maintaining HN’s ethos I’ll assume good faith. Your link [1] talks about Nord Stream 2. It was halted. With sanctions. With the stroke of a pen the U.S. could do the same to Nord Stream 1. [1] https://www.reuters.com/world/biden-germanys-scholz-stress-unified-front-against-any-russian-aggression-toward-2022-02-07/ https://www.reuters.com/world/biden-germanys-scholz-stress-u...
  - aa-jv 4y ago
    Biden literally said that the US would make sure Nord Stream was taken out, that 'they would find a way to make sure it was done for good'. Why is it so difficult for you to confront this fact? I guess because if it is true, the USA has committed yet another unilateral act of aggression in its own interests, disregarding the human rights of millions of Europeans...
    - JumpCrisscross 4y ago
      You're muddling comments made about Nord Stream 2 with Nord Stream 1. Nord Stream 2 is done for good. Europe can't buy gas through a sanctioned pipe. > Why is it so difficult for you to confront this fact? You're getting pushback for repeatedly taking Biden's comments about sanctioning Nord Stream 2 to represent incompetently bombing Nord Stream 1. (Also, for claiming we have anything resembling facts with respect to attribution.)
      - aa-jv 4y ago
        He didn't mention sanctions. He intentionally kept the response ambiguous as to how "the US would find a way" ...

voakbasda 4y ago

Good thing politicians are never duplicitous liars. We can trust them to do exactly what they say and know they will never dare betray their constituents.

aa-jv 4y ago

JumpCrisscross 4y ago
> Biden even announced he'd do it Looking at your recent comment history, it’s difficult to take these claims seriously, given their repetition and wrongness. But in the effort of maintaining HN’s ethos I’ll assume good faith. Your link [1] talks about Nord Stream 2. It was halted. With sanctions. With the stroke of a pen the U.S. could do the same to Nord Stream 1. [1] https://www.reuters.com/world/biden-germanys-scholz-stress-unified-front-against-any-russian-aggression-toward-2022-02-07/ https://www.reuters.com/world/biden-germanys-scholz-stress-u...
- aa-jv 4y ago
  Biden literally said that the US would make sure Nord Stream was taken out, that 'they would find a way to make sure it was done for good'. Why is it so difficult for you to confront this fact? I guess because if it is true, the USA has committed yet another unilateral act of aggression in its own interests, disregarding the human rights of millions of Europeans...
  - JumpCrisscross 4y ago
    You're muddling comments made about Nord Stream 2 with Nord Stream 1. Nord Stream 2 is done for good. Europe can't buy gas through a sanctioned pipe. > Why is it so difficult for you to confront this fact? You're getting pushback for repeatedly taking Biden's comments about sanctioning Nord Stream 2 to represent incompetently bombing Nord Stream 1. (Also, for claiming we have anything resembling facts with respect to attribution.)
    - aa-jv 4y ago
      He didn't mention sanctions. He intentionally kept the response ambiguous as to how "the US would find a way" ...