2 ms·
Huh. I saw an article the other day which was only about the US, and the bad stuff was only because of a US specific event. And there were also a couple of art
by mellavora 4y ago
Huh. I saw an article the other day which was only about the US, and the bad stuff was only because of a US specific event.
And there were also a couple of articles which really only applied to California. Really, who cares about health impacts from wildfire smoke, it only affects livability in a few parts of the world.
Hey, sorry for the snarky tone, you deserve better. I'm just thinking of friends of mine whose mortgage cost just doubled. And thanks to the UK gilt meltdown, no banks are issuing mortgages.
- maximus-decimus 4y agoThe difference with an article about wildfire smoke is it would probably be obvious if it applies to you or not. This is more the equivalent of an article name "Air quality down 42% since last year!" and once you read the article you realize it only applies to people living in California because of fires.