3 ms·
Anyone 1500+ can recognize the natural move--that's what makes it natural. Probably the easiest case of "natural move but blunder" is anything that is a top 3
by fizx 4y ago
Anyone 1500+ can recognize the natural move--that's what makes it natural.
Probably the easiest case of "natural move but blunder" is anything that is a top 3 engine move when looking 3-5 moves deep, but losing significantly on deeper evaluation.
Also, this sort of categorization is at the heart of how chess puzzle collections are automatically assembled. A good chess puzzle contains an unnatural move that wins--the exact opposite of the natural but blunder. Chess sites scan their online play databases for these all the time, and serve them up as puzzles.
- SamBam 4y ago> Anyone 1500+ can recognize the natural move--that's what makes it natural. Any human 1500+ can recognize the natural human move. The way the computer thinks about moves is different. I really don't believe that Stockfish can tell you "this move is tempting, but wrong." I'm sure you could build something in that might kind of work, but until I see it I'm skeptical.