You're just doing what the TFA did, which is notice some trends and assume they'll continue until the point of some sort of "disaster". But you don't have a clu

You're just doing what the TFA did, which is notice some trends and assume they'll continue until the point of some sort of "disaster". But you don't have a clue, just been exposed to too much hype. To be specific - how much biodiversity do we need to avoid disaster such a global economic collapse? I don't know how to measure that but you surely do or you'd have no justification for your stated opinions.