4 ms·

Why so hostile in your comments? It's not a competition about being the fastest. If anything, it only shows immaturity on your part. Time spent setting up a pro

Why so hostile in your comments? It's not a competition about being the fastest. If anything, it only shows immaturity on your part. Time spent setting up a project is negligible compared to other things surrounding it. You're anyways missing my point. Nextjs isn't a silver bullet, nothing is. And that how long it takes to set up a project is a function of familiarity with the stack. Edit: thanks for deleting all your personal attacks on me. But also remember, I'm not the one claiming to know everything here (as you wrote in your now deleted post), you're the one that critiqued OP.

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
criley2 4y ago
- dang 4y ago
  Please don't do this sort of tit-for-tat flamewar (or any flamewar) on HN. It's tedious, nasty, and not what this site is for. We've had to ask you this kind of thing before. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.
dang 4y ago
Please don't do this sort of tit-for-tat flamewar (or any flamewar) on HN. It's tedious, nasty, and not what this site is for. We've had to ask you this kind of thing before. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.
- matsemann 4y ago
  I honestly don't believe I did that in this instance. I felt I argued on technical merits. If you can find their deleted post (not their flagged posts, but a deleted one), you'll see my responses were quite level headed in comparison. After I read that one, asking why they were so hostile feels justified (and quite weak in comparison) on my end.
  - dang 4y ago
    I'm not saying your comments were symmetrical, but (a) you kept the flamewar going, which the site guidelines explicitly ask commenters not to do here; and (b) once people start arguing about what they are or are not saying, or feel compelled to include swipes like "Why so hostile in your comments?", "If anything, it only shows immaturity on your part", "You're anyways missing my point", it's clear that the thread has degenerated into the tit-for-tat state.

deleted 4y ago

[deleted]

criley2 4y ago

dang 4y ago
Please don't do this sort of tit-for-tat flamewar (or any flamewar) on HN. It's tedious, nasty, and not what this site is for. We've had to ask you this kind of thing before. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.

dang 4y ago

Please don't do this sort of tit-for-tat flamewar (or any flamewar) on HN. It's tedious, nasty, and not what this site is for. We've had to ask you this kind of thing before. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.

matsemann 4y ago
I honestly don't believe I did that in this instance. I felt I argued on technical merits. If you can find their deleted post (not their flagged posts, but a deleted one), you'll see my responses were quite level headed in comparison. After I read that one, asking why they were so hostile feels justified (and quite weak in comparison) on my end.
- dang 4y ago
  I'm not saying your comments were symmetrical, but (a) you kept the flamewar going, which the site guidelines explicitly ask commenters not to do here; and (b) once people start arguing about what they are or are not saying, or feel compelled to include swipes like "Why so hostile in your comments?", "If anything, it only shows immaturity on your part", "You're anyways missing my point", it's clear that the thread has degenerated into the tit-for-tat state.