4 ms·
Doesn't than line of thinking mean that anybody can accuse somebody of cheating when they unexpectedly beat them?
by andrepd 4y ago
Doesn't than line of thinking mean that anybody can accuse somebody of cheating when they unexpectedly beat them?
- stouset 4y agoNo, it means that the reality of catching cheaters in chess is fundamentally heuristic if you don't manage to catch them red-handed. This accusation hits many of the heuristic high notes. That doesn't mean he definitively cheated. But to me, with ~15 years of chess under my belt, it does make this accusation credible.
- yesseri 4y agoNiemann have admitted cheating before when playing online, so Carlsen is just not making this up about any random player. There is a history of cheating.
- ddalex 4y agoThere is no smoking gun, but there is a lot of smoke. The ease with which Niemann pulled out of the hand a couple of brilliant moves, without spending too much time thinking about it, on an unusual line, is highly suspicious.