4 ms·

So you agree that Magnus is wrong and that Hans did not cheat in the OTB game. And if you also agree with Magnus that cheating is a major problem then him sing

So you agree that Magnus is wrong and that Hans did not cheat in the OTB game. And if you also agree with Magnus that cheating is a major problem then him singling out a single player who happened to beat him in OTB chess, as opposed to asking for wholesale changes for the past so many years to tackle cheating more seriously when he owns one of the top chess organizations and has partnerships with nearly every other chess organization, seems like him just being a sore loser. I don’t need to defend Hans’s cheating to point out that Magnus’s response has been ridiculous because it’s entirely focused on 1 individual player as opposed to the actual large scale problem of cheating in chess. A guy who happened to beat him OTB in a game where he likely did not cheat at all.

simonh 4y ago
> So you agree that Magnus is wrong and that Hans did not cheat in the OTB game. There’s a world of difference between holding a personal opinion that X is probably true, and agreeing that X is an established fact. > Magnus’s response has been ridiculous because it’s entirely focused on 1 individual player as opposed to the actual large scale problem of cheating in chess From the letter: “I also believe that chess organizers and all those who care about the sanctity of the game we love should seriously consider increasing security measures and methods of cheat detection for over the board chess.”