3 ms·
I am limited in what I can say without explicit permission from Niemann What? I'd like him to explicitly state what rule/law/agreement prevents him from sayin
by gmiller123456 4y ago
I am limited in what I can say without explicit permission from Niemann
What? I'd like him to explicitly state what rule/law/agreement prevents him from saying more. He explicitly accused him of cheating. I can't imagine what would prevent him from providing details.
- bombcar 4y agoI expect it's GDPR-covered or similar cheating examples from chess.com or whatever site it was that he saw all the list of cheaters from.
- gizmo 4y agoGDPR??? Not at all related.
- djrockstar1 4y agoChess.com already put out a statement saying Carlsen has not seen anything about their cheat detection or their list of known cheaters.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 4y agoSlander / libel laws, I would imagine. It seems like he was more careful in his phrasing than to make an explicit accusation.
- fotta 4y agoI'd guess it's some sort of legal litigation.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- cmeacham98 4y agoMy guess is some sort of FIDE dispute process that binds both parties to (partial) secrecy.
- djrockstar1 4y agoFIDE already put out a statement saying they know nothing about this incident and want Carlsen to put forward initial evidence for them to start an investigation. Carlsen's statement shows that he has no evidence beyond his feelings over the board and Hans' history of cheating online.
- 6nf 4y agoMagnus owns 20% of Chess.com. Chess.com put out a statement basically saying 'we have sent Hans evidence that he cheated more than the two times he admitted to' Chess.com / Magnus is waiting for Niemann to respond.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- denlekke 4y agochess.com said they haven't provided Carlson with their list of detected cheaters or any info on the cheating detection system
- gmiller123456 4y agoI'm not asking people to guess, I'm asking him to either commit to some allegations (with evidence) or to explain why he can't.