I read it on Saturday, and it hadn't mentioned it then: https://web.archive.org/web/20220924090459/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/24/business/linkedin-social-

I read it on Saturday, and it hadn't mentioned it then: https://web.archive.org/web/20220924090459/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/24/business/linkedin-social-experiments.html https://web.archive.org/web/20220924090459/https://www.nytim... Looks like they realized they got caught and updated it. TBH, I could 100% believe that the reporter and editor had no idea the NYT did it themselves, because anyone would be clued in enough to understand that wouldn't have written the article in the first place.