That's not bait and switch, that's just not the license terms. > even though they were only distributing the viewer internally. That is explicitly allowed. Yo

That's not bait and switch, that's just not the license terms. > even though they were only distributing the viewer internally. That is explicitly allowed. You just have to live with consequences of it being legal for any of the users to take and "bring back to the light". It is either that this company didn't wanted their inside people to do that, or that Linden lied to them about what GPL implies