3 ms·

NYTimes runs social experiments on users for years: https://open.nytimes.com/how-we-rearchitected-mobile-a-b-testing-at-the-new-york-times-78eb428d9132?gi=fddd

by xxpor 4y ago

NYTimes runs social experiments on users for years: https://open.nytimes.com/how-we-rearchitected-mobile-a-b-testing-at-the-new-york-times-78eb428d9132?gi=fddd3d15197d https://open.nytimes.com/how-we-rearchitected-mobile-a-b-tes...

karaterobot 4y ago
This is mentioned in the article. But yeah, it is ironic. And given that newspaper headlines are pretty much all some people read, I wouldn't say it's any less harmless than suggesting weak ties for your linkedin network.
fenek 4y ago
Did you read the article? It's right in the article: > The New York Times uses such tests to assess the wording of headlines and to make decisions about the products and features the company releases.
- dominotw 4y ago
  https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html > "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that."
- xxpor 4y ago
  I read it on Saturday, and it hadn't mentioned it then: https://web.archive.org/web/20220924090459/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/24/business/linkedin-social-experiments.html https://web.archive.org/web/20220924090459/https://www.nytim... Looks like they realized they got caught and updated it. TBH, I could 100% believe that the reporter and editor had no idea the NYT did it themselves, because anyone would be clued in enough to understand that wouldn't have written the article in the first place.
observd 4y ago
> The Times also makes a practice of running what are called A/B tests on the digital headlines that appear on its homepage: Half of readers will see one headline, and the other half will see an alternative headline, for about half an hour. At the end of the test, The Times will use the headline that attracted more readers. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/23/insider/headline-trump-time-interview.html https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/23/insider/headline-trump-ti...

by xxpor 4y ago

karaterobot 4y ago

This is mentioned in the article. But yeah, it is ironic. And given that newspaper headlines are pretty much all some people read, I wouldn't say it's any less harmless than suggesting weak ties for your linkedin network.

fenek 4y ago

Did you read the article? It's right in the article: > The New York Times uses such tests to assess the wording of headlines and to make decisions about the products and features the company releases.

dominotw 4y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html > "Did you even read the article? It mentions that" can be shortened to "The article mentions that."
xxpor 4y ago
I read it on Saturday, and it hadn't mentioned it then: https://web.archive.org/web/20220924090459/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/24/business/linkedin-social-experiments.html https://web.archive.org/web/20220924090459/https://www.nytim... Looks like they realized they got caught and updated it. TBH, I could 100% believe that the reporter and editor had no idea the NYT did it themselves, because anyone would be clued in enough to understand that wouldn't have written the article in the first place.

observd 4y ago

> The Times also makes a practice of running what are called A/B tests on the digital headlines that appear on its homepage: Half of readers will see one headline, and the other half will see an alternative headline, for about half an hour. At the end of the test, The Times will use the headline that attracted more readers. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/23/insider/headline-trump-time-interview.html https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/23/insider/headline-trump-ti...