3 ms·
I had to stop reading half way through because it was so awful on the eyes. I felt like I was reading the dot com bubble off Scoble's belly. Anyways, here it i
by fallentimes 18y ago
I had to stop reading half way through because it was so awful on the eyes. I felt like I was reading the dot com bubble off Scoble's belly.
Anyways, here it is in plain text (the formatting and capitalization errors are still annoying, however):
http://tinypaste.com/c87ae http://tinypaste.com/c87ae
- davidw 18y agoIt's like it's 1996 and he discovered the font tag.
- davemc500hats 18y agoI'm really sorry about my capitalization & font choices. I really had no idea. I mean, i've been writing that way intentionally for about 3-4 years, but now after readig your comments i'm so sorry and I've seen the light. Jesus H Christ. you want spell checkers & times roman font? read the fucking Economist. (and I do, but not for inspiriation & entrepreneurship).
- davidw 18y agoSorry, I guess my comment was a bit snarky. However, it's evident that 1) people thought your idea was good, but 2) the cRaZEE f0N+ S+ylz bug them. Overall, that's good: fonts are easy to fix, good writing is harder to come by. Agreed on The Economist, it's a great read.
- fallentimes 18y agoOnly if you want anyone to take you seriously. If not, don't bother. It's your blog - you can do whatever the heck you want :). Economist is great.
- davemc500hats 18y agoyeah, so i get that i'm an acquired taste. maybe i'll tone that down someday, but change isn't easy and it's probably true that i am a bit off my rocker. agreed, Economist is pretty much my favorite print mag. too bad they don't do more red bold fonts in their online edition ;)