4 ms·
I suppose it depends on the jurisdiction. For instance, some courts, like the 9th District Court of Appeals have ruled that cities can't remove homeless camping
by cronix 4y ago
I suppose it depends on the jurisdiction. For instance, some courts, like the 9th District Court of Appeals have ruled that cities can't remove homeless camping on public property. Public forests are public, and there's lots of trail cams.
https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/court-ruling-homless-sleep-public/ https://www.cbsnews.com/sacramento/news/court-ruling-homless...
- kube-system 4y agoForcibly moving living people and removing unattended property are entirely different scenarios.
- bobthepanda 4y agoYeah, the issue with those who are homeless is that it essentially criminalizes living for people who cannot rent or own, and thus infringes on their liberties. There’s no right to hang up privately owned cameras in public.
- orangepurple 4y agoI am imagining an army of homeless sitting at every intersection in the US holding surveillance cameras and getting paid by # of unique plates scanned per minute
- squeaky-clean 4y agoReminds me of the company that got homeless people to be 4g wifi hotspots at SXSW https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2012/03/13/148506762/turning-homeless-men-into-wifi-hotspots-at-sxsw-ignites-debate https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2012/03/13/148506762...