3 ms·
Nothing you say here has any relation to eSIMs. 1. This problem can exist with real SIMs too. Back many years ago Verizon used to lock your SIM to a specific I
by cmeacham98 4y ago
Nothing you say here has any relation to eSIMs.
1. This problem can exist with real SIMs too. Back many years ago Verizon used to lock your SIM to a specific IMEI and you had to call them to change it (they might have even charged a fee for changing it, I don't remember for sure?)
2. Nothing prevents a phone company from offering an anonymized eSIM.
Anonymous phone numbers are drying up, but not because of eSIMs.
- awill 4y agoVerizon is a bad example as they were CDMA and always more locked down
- cmeacham98 4y agoVerizon happens to be the provider I had at the time, I wouldn't be surprised if other providers did it too.
- saghm 4y agoWhen I was on Verizon, I remember having to go into their store to get a new SIM each time I got a phone that wasn't through them. Using eSIMs after I switched to Fi was a small but noticeable quality of life improvement for me at least.
- rubyn00bie 4y agoAs another comment said, you’re referring to Verizon’s CDMA network. Which did not use GSM and this did not use SIM cards. Literally, no SIM cards. It wasn’t until their LTE network they supported SIM cards in any meaningful way. Their handsets were locked to their network and only worked on their network. Occasionally, an “international” phone would be sold that had CDMA + GSM so their customers could use it overseas but the SIM card slot did literally nothing here in the states since those phones wouldn’t have supported T-Mobile or AT&T’s network frequencies. And just because nothing prevents a phone company from offering them, doesn’t mean they will. Having the ability to just move a SIM card is very pro-consumer in a way I don’t think esims will ever be (unless the EU regulates it).
- indymike 4y agoMore recent versions of CMDA devices did support SIM cards.
- baybal2 4y ago