3 ms·
I meant a standardized REST protocol. Why does it have (or ever had) to be something obscure like SMTP/POP3/IMAP if it could be just REST (still standardized, n
by qwerty456127 4y ago
I meant a standardized REST protocol. Why does it have (or ever had) to be something obscure like SMTP/POP3/IMAP if it could be just REST (still standardized, name it whatever)?
- weird-eye-issue 4y agoHard enough to get people within the same company to agree on something or use consistent API conventions... Heck you'd probably have a hard time just getting people to agree to use REST. "Why not GraphQL?"
- GoblinSlayer 4y agoIMAP is more efficient than REST.
- qwerty456127 4y agoIs it so much more efficient to be worth the obscurity?
- GoblinSlayer 4y agoIMAP is not obscured, it's quite front and bright if you ask me.