4 ms·
This particular line in the developer's response[1] leads me to believe they don't - or at least don't properly - validate third party dependency changes, which
by krono 4y ago
This particular line in the developer's response[1] leads me to believe they don't - or at least don't properly - validate third party dependency changes, which is even more worrying if I'm honest:
> I will look into why Sentry.io is being contacted so often! This is strange as unless they changed their SDK/framework, is only supposed to happen on a crash report.
1: https://github.com/objective-see/LuLu/issues/488#issuecomment-1257292982 https://github.com/objective-see/LuLu/issues/488#issuecommen...
- AdamGibbins 4y agoThat's a poor characterisation, I'm not convinced any developer can say with 100% certainty they've never missed anything in the release notes of their dependencies or had any unexpected behaviour in changes that made it to production. Mistakes happen.
- krono 4y agoThe nature and capabilities of these products makes me significantly less forgiving towards these sorts of mistakes, however. Just to be clear I have no ill will towards this developer or their products.
- fnord123 4y agoI agree with sibling: I think you're giving it an uncharitable interpretation. There is an open issue and they are investigating to improve the situation.
- tinus_hn 4y agoYou’d think, if they wanted telemetry so badly they are prepared to deal with the fallout, they’d be on top of the information collected by that telemetry.