2 ms·
In large companies, don't assume that there is a coherent and unified vision on hiring or growth. Different managers/directors/VPs have their own portfolios, t
by sbarre 4y ago
In large companies, don't assume that there is a coherent and unified vision on hiring or growth.
Different managers/directors/VPs have their own portfolios, their own budgets, their own roadmaps and KPIs. This leads to duplication, inefficiencies, and more.. But tech companies make so much money that in most cases this is accepted as cost of doing business - up to a point.
Also in some places, if you don't hire for your headcount, it becomes harder to get it back later when you truly need it..
There is a ton of organizational dysfunction like that in very larger companies (thousands of employees or more), even in the "best" companies that HN likes to fawn over.
- logifail 4y ago> In large companies, don't assume that there is a coherent and unified vision on hiring or growth ...or indeed a coherent and unified vision on anything at all
- dv_dt 4y agoExecs should also get held responsible for some churndex number because that ultimately reflects on how good the execution is in a way that cash flow deltas alone does not reflect.
- sbarre 4y agoYes but since execs make the rules, they never will... Class solidarity is real.