3 ms·
Biblical books are biased to assert Jesus existed as they describe him. There are no neutral historical records to prove he specifically existed. Besides, your
by gurumeditations 4y ago
Biblical books are biased to assert Jesus existed as they describe him. There are no neutral historical records to prove he specifically existed. Besides, your “historical documents” contain competing narratives of events with each other, supernatural magic, and exist as part of a handpicked religious narrative that left other books out at that.
- arcanus 4y ago> There are no neutral historical records to prove he specifically existed. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus "Virtually all scholars of antiquity accept that Jesus was a historical figure" For non-Christian sources, see: Tacitus, Suetonius, Josephus. It's virtually a certainty Jesus existed. Whether he was the 'son of God' is a very different discussion.