> It is debated by people like Richard Carrier Yes, but there’s little debate amongst scholars that aren’t atheist activists. For instance, it’s extremely diff

> It is debated by people like Richard Carrier Yes, but there’s little debate amongst scholars that aren’t atheist activists. For instance, it’s extremely difficult to explain the historical facts of the early Christian movement without a historical Jesus due to those events being so recent and broadly falsifiable via living memory let alone records extant at the time and there being no evidence of the Romans using a lack of historical evidence for Jesus as an argument against Christianity.