> but many parents don't want their taxes to be put towards exposing children to ideas that they don't agree with Speaking of vagueness, perhaps we might elabo

> but many parents don't want their taxes to be put towards exposing children to ideas that they don't agree with Speaking of vagueness, perhaps we might elaborate on what books are being banned and what is so wrong about them. Presumably you brought up pornography because it is a fitting comparison, so let's flesh out the pornographic angle more concretely. Many here are interested in asking whether Cloudflare censors; under the context of these discussions it is not overly vague to ask whether Texas or Florida is banning. One is a company (market cap 17.8 billion) and the other is a state with monopoly power. It is not that people refuse to allow tax money to fund books; these books are simply not permitted in public libraries and schools. The source of funding is a distracting argument when some people simply want these books gone whether or not they're donated.