Yeah. I don't think so. They want the information that others have created to be free - whee... But they're 1) being paid for their non-physical, presumably pro

Yeah. I don't think so. They want the information that others have created to be free - whee... But they're 1) being paid for their non-physical, presumably proprietary, creative efforts and 2) think people should pay them (but I guess not from funds derived based on the protection of IP) so they can pursue some different intellectual pursuit.