The article is incredulous at times, I'm not deny that or trying to defend it. However, I don't understand why the author needs to have a solution to present?

The article is incredulous at times, I'm not deny that or trying to defend it. However, I don't understand why the author needs to have a solution to present? You wouldn't ask the person running into your burning home to tell you and your sleeping family that the house is on fire for a solution, would you? People need to sound the bell.