4 ms·
Ok, this is ridiculous, given your position, I'm not going to spend long on this but: > Just like a single exploding windmill in Denmark doesn't change much ab
by mijoharas 4y ago
Ok, this is ridiculous, given your position, I'm not going to spend long on this but:
> Just like a single exploding windmill in Denmark doesn't change much about reliability of wind power
First off, you realise France has 56 nuclear power stations? I'm wondering where you're getting "single sample" and "single windmill" from
If, over a year, 40% of windmills in Denmark weren't producing power, it would make a hell of a lot of sense to question the reliability of Danish windmills.
I don't know why you pulled out the straw man of saying the person was questioning all of nuclear power, but they had a very reasonable fact-based question.
I'd be very happy to listen to any data or explanations you could bring, but frankly you don't seem to be discussing things in good faith right now.