3 ms·
I responded to the claim "there is literally zero evidence for it" by pointing out that there is circumstantial evidence, and eyewitness accounts.
by MichaelCollins 4y ago
I responded to the claim "there is literally zero evidence for it" by pointing out that there is circumstantial evidence, and eyewitness accounts.
- growse 4y agoThe problem is that this circumstantial evidence contradicts actual hard evidence on the wreckage.
- MichaelCollins 4y agoCircumstantial evidence that seems to be contradicted by other evidence is still evidence. To claim that there is 'literally zero evidence' is literally wrong.