4 ms·
The linchpin of your argument seems to be that we need to believe the official reason given, and that the CIA would never lie to the American public. That soun
by sonotathrowaway 4y ago
The linchpin of your argument seems to be that we need to believe the official reason given, and that the CIA would never lie to the American public.
That sounds naïve to anyone with even a passing familiarity with American history.
- thfuran 4y agoWhereas the lynchpin of your argument, inasmuch as there is one, is "pfff, who needs evidence when you can have allegations instead".
- sonotathrowaway 4y ago
- tremon 4y agoRather, the linchpin of their argument is "a public explanation given by the CIA carries less weight than no explanation at all".