3 ms·
This feels like a net loss for both privacy and freedom. It's giving Apple way too much power and too many special privileges. The rule of thumb for things like
by josephcsible 4y ago
This feels like a net loss for both privacy and freedom. It's giving Apple way too much power and too many special privileges. The rule of thumb for things like this should be "would this be feasible on 100% open source hardware?".
- vicegold 4y agoDid you read the article? It‘s based on privacy pass protocol, and Apple is just the first major vendor to support them on OS level. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-privacypass-auth-scheme-01.html https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-privacypass-auth-...
- josephcsible 4y agoYes, and these are the specific points that concern me: > the Attester is Apple, the device vendor > The Apple attester will check various device components, confirm they are valid