4 ms·

Main site: http://pilimi.org/ http://pilimi.org/ Torrents can be obtained via their onion site: http://2urmf2mk2dhmz4km522u4yfy2ynbzkbejf2cvmpcbzhpffvcuksrz6ad

Main site: http://pilimi.org/ http://pilimi.org/ Torrents can be obtained via their onion site: http://2urmf2mk2dhmz4km522u4yfy2ynbzkbejf2cvmpcbzhpffvcuksrz6ad.onion/zlib-downloads.html http://2urmf2mk2dhmz4km522u4yfy2ynbzkbejf2cvmpcbzhpffvcuksrz... (requires Tor to follow link) Using onion.ws proxy: http://2urmf2mk2dhmz4km522u4yfy2ynbzkbejf2cvmpcbzhpffvcuksrz6ad.onion.ws/zlib-downloads.html http://2urmf2mk2dhmz4km522u4yfy2ynbzkbejf2cvmpcbzhpffvcuksrz... (doesn't require Tor)

mmastrac 4y ago
How does one actually download this many torrent files? It feels quite difficult to do.
- yaddaor 4y ago
  That's just about 80. Any client can handle that. Use a watch directory or a client that allows to add *.torrent or drag them all to a GUI and hold down Enter or sumthin ;-)
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- mike_d 4y ago
  Many Linux command line torrent clients can be told to load "*.torrent"
- SSLy 4y ago
  qBittorrent can handle at least 1500 torrents fine, try that. Source? My desktop instance seeding right now.
jeroenhd 4y ago
I wonder why these services don't generate vanity TOR domains. I can generate about 21 TOR addresses beginning with "zlib" per second and it would make bookmarks so much more recognisable if they weren't completely random. I know relying on names to recognise onion addresses is unsafe, but so is following random links. Why not add at least a little recognisability to the official URL?
- ok_dad 4y ago
  Because then someone will duplicate the UI and generate a new vanity address and start to do bad stuff under their good name.
  - jeroenhd 4y ago
    How is that any different from the random character address? I can generate a random address and pretend to be another website and you won't know the difference because all you'll remember about the address is "a while bunch if random letters".
    - ok_dad 4y ago
      Yea, I guess a stupid computer user would probably fall for it either way, so I admit defeat on this front. My argument was going to be along the lines of: "a stupid computer user who knows the real address starts with zlib would be tricked easier by another zlib address than if the real site were random, where they might check more thouroughly that they were on the right site..." before being fooled, anyways, probably.
- runeks 4y ago
  > Why not add at least a little recognisability to the official URL? Because it doesn't help at all. The first four letters of an onion URL are unimportant because they can be chosen with little effort, as you describe. Following random links and following random links that start with "zlib" is the same thing.
  - jeroenhd 4y ago
    It's obviously not a security benefit, it's just nice to have a little branding so you have some idea what the link you're clicking is pretending to be As you said, it's effectively the same thing, so why not do the tiniest amount of effort and generate some slightly indicative address?

mmastrac 4y ago

How does one actually download this many torrent files? It feels quite difficult to do.

yaddaor 4y ago
That's just about 80. Any client can handle that. Use a watch directory or a client that allows to add *.torrent or drag them all to a GUI and hold down Enter or sumthin ;-)
deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
mike_d 4y ago
Many Linux command line torrent clients can be told to load "*.torrent"
SSLy 4y ago
qBittorrent can handle at least 1500 torrents fine, try that. Source? My desktop instance seeding right now.

jeroenhd 4y ago

I wonder why these services don't generate vanity TOR domains. I can generate about 21 TOR addresses beginning with "zlib" per second and it would make bookmarks so much more recognisable if they weren't completely random. I know relying on names to recognise onion addresses is unsafe, but so is following random links. Why not add at least a little recognisability to the official URL?

ok_dad 4y ago
Because then someone will duplicate the UI and generate a new vanity address and start to do bad stuff under their good name.
- jeroenhd 4y ago
  How is that any different from the random character address? I can generate a random address and pretend to be another website and you won't know the difference because all you'll remember about the address is "a while bunch if random letters".
  - ok_dad 4y ago
    Yea, I guess a stupid computer user would probably fall for it either way, so I admit defeat on this front. My argument was going to be along the lines of: "a stupid computer user who knows the real address starts with zlib would be tricked easier by another zlib address than if the real site were random, where they might check more thouroughly that they were on the right site..." before being fooled, anyways, probably.
runeks 4y ago
> Why not add at least a little recognisability to the official URL? Because it doesn't help at all. The first four letters of an onion URL are unimportant because they can be chosen with little effort, as you describe. Following random links and following random links that start with "zlib" is the same thing.
- jeroenhd 4y ago
  It's obviously not a security benefit, it's just nice to have a little branding so you have some idea what the link you're clicking is pretending to be As you said, it's effectively the same thing, so why not do the tiniest amount of effort and generate some slightly indicative address?