3 ms·
What about the Navy radar tracks for an intercepting missile, and how those, like witness accounts, were actively discounted and suppressed, in favor of a "no m
by ipsin 4y ago
What about the Navy radar tracks for an intercepting missile, and how those, like witness accounts, were actively discounted and suppressed, in favor of a "no missile" narrative?
- ceejayoz 4y ago> What about the Navy radar tracks for an intercepting missile The radar tracks are detailed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TWA_Flight_800#Missile_or_bomb_detonation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TWA_Flight_800#Missile_or_bomb... They're not from the Navy (they're ATC tracks), they don't intersect, and one of them's going 30 knots.
- Gamecollector 4y agoYou've made about 20 comments on this thread and all of them demonstrate you haven't read a single word of the docket. Plaintiffs now have the Navy radar tapes and they show and object hitting the plane then spiraling away from it.
- ceejayoz 4y ago> You've made about 20 comments on this thread and all of them demonstrate you haven't read a single word of the docket. Plaintiffs now have the Navy radar tapes... Pot, meet kettle. The docket actually says this: "For example, Dr. Stalcup obtained several FBI records never released to the TWA 800 families or the public. One described an 'original [Navy radar] tape' showing an object “heading straight for TWA 800.'" There's no claim they have the actual tapes. We'll see what the record they've got says; that they're not parading it to the media is, at the very least, interesting.