3 ms·
Could you please elaborate? What do you mean by a "demo"? An MVP of how it would like? It is actually a work in progress, so it doesn't exist yet. We are gather
by kourouklides 4y ago
Could you please elaborate? What do you mean by a "demo"? An MVP of how it would like? It is actually a work in progress, so it doesn't exist yet. We are gathering feedback on the Research Rroposal, which is in the form of a pre-print paper. Stay tuned for a Whitepaper though, which will be more practical.
- p1esk 4y agoYou posted a 126 page “proposal for Grand Theory of AI” on the internet, and want people to read it? If you think you have something valuable to contribute to AI research build a working demo, or at least publish it in a decent conference (such as ICML, ICLR, or NeurIPS). Until then no one is going to take you seriously.
- gardenfelder 4y agoEdit: Violent disagreement
- kourouklides 4y agoOk, easy tiger. 1) It was intentionally NOT submitted to a "descent" conference (or to a "prestigious" journal that I have already published before as co-author anyway) because I don't believe in that process or system. I used an OSF preprint (which is similar to arXiv, but more properly implemented). 2) Thanks for the feedback on creating a prototype / MVP. What I suggested is related to infrastructure, not so much with the "client-side", so demo is later on in the Roadmap. I just wanted to find some people to join the project early in order to build that demo under the umbrella of a Foundation. I hope it is clearer to you now.
- p1esk 4y agoI’m sorry - I was grumpy when I wrote my previous comment. There are certainly worse ways to spend one’s time than to write about AGI. I have nothing against your proposal (I haven’t read it) and I wish you good luck in building whatever it is you want to build, or finding collaborators.