3 ms·
Double entry accounting would have me move money into an "account" representing my ISP Well, no, unless you account your ISP as some important contractor or a
by wruza 4y ago
Double entry accounting would have me move money into an "account" representing my ISP
Well, no, unless you account your ISP as some important contractor or a cofounder and have interest rates etc with them.
If it is just a simple expense, you do the following:
debit: expenses / basic needs
credit: bank / account
sum: $80
This way you can see your expenses on an “expenses” account regardless of where they came from. No need to scan for multiple sources, because they all end up on a single account. This is a beauty of accounting, you define not how, but what. You bought a tv?
debit: My stuff / tv
credit: Bank / account
sum: $1000
Your tv broke?
debit: Expenses / Breakage
credit: My stuff / tv
sum: <a remaining cost of
tv, depending on
amortization scheme>
With single entry you either cannot do that, or have to scan all tables and invent a special field that represents type of an operation, in this case isExpense or shard tables by that criterion.
- blep_ 4y agoThis requires you to know up front which expenses you want to track, though. If you don't, and you change your mind later, you get to do that table scan anyway, so you may as well actually record the metadata that makes it possible. edit: I read what you're describing here as a single entry system if you just read "expense account" as "expense type"; double entry would be if you physically recorded each of those in two places. It's entirely possible we're arguing about semantics.