2 ms·
That’s a pretty bold statement. The null hypothesis is that there’s nothing in the body that cannot in principle be emulated in silico to whatever precision nec
by Sharlin 4y ago
That’s a pretty bold statement. The null hypothesis is that there’s nothing in the body that cannot in principle be emulated in silico to whatever precision necessary.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- jodrellblank 4y agoWhy is that the null hypothesis? For one thing, the only experience we have is existing as bodies in a real world, so that should be the default with any other claims being supported by evidence. For another thing, simulating a bridge falling down is not a bridge falling down, and it's not proven that simulated thinking is thinking (or even, possible).