> Do you really want a world where everybody mistrusts you and nobody believes your word without cryptographic proof or something? That's why we have a balance

> Do you really want a world where everybody mistrusts you and nobody believes your word without cryptographic proof or something? That's why we have a balance with indemnity/damages, which also can be punitive, which simply state: "Of course you can fool people. However, better don't otherwise you will regret it, buddy." I side with you. Trust does not mean you cannot be fooled in the first place. That's why it is called trust.