2 ms·
Wikipedia needs better uptime than AWS. Don't get me wrong, AWS is probably a good idea but not just yet.
by alecco 18y ago
Wikipedia needs better uptime than AWS. Don't get me wrong, AWS is probably a good idea but not just yet.
- shawndrost 18y agoHmm, my best research shows that Wikipedia's uptime is 99.8% [1], and AWS' SLA gives 99.9% [2]. [1] http://uptime.pingdom.com/site/month_summary/site_name/en.wikipedia.org http://uptime.pingdom.com/site/month_summary/site_name/en.wi... [2] http://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/media-coverage/2007/10/10/wired-new-from-amazon-guaranteed-server-uptime/ http://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/media-coverage/2007/10/10/wi...
- alecco 18y agoBut it will probably compound and net result will be more like 0.999 * 0.998 = 0.997