That leads to a consensus problem. If you have two sensors reporting different circumstances, which one do you trust? Do you err on the side of assuming the cra

That leads to a consensus problem. If you have two sensors reporting different circumstances, which one do you trust? Do you err on the side of assuming the crash report is a false positive? Then you may fail to report a real crash when you really have a false negative (the non-crash report). For the feature to be useful, with only a pair of sensors and no reason to assume that the one is giving a false positive, you should err on the side of caution.