4 ms·
After checking their github repos I’m only seeing a web mail client with metamask for auth instead of user password. It’s using a normal graphql api. Very decen
by mccorrinall 4y ago
After checking their github repos I’m only seeing a web mail client with metamask for auth instead of user password. It’s using a normal graphql api. Very decentral. I guess web3.0 only requires a „login with metamask“-button now.
Oh, and about the cool, very decentral drive on IPFS thing: the drive is still only on a single server, pinned by a single server. That’s how IPFS works. It it would work otherwise and they didn’t have to actually pay their storage bills, they wouldn’t limit the storage to a mediocre 10GB less-than-gdrive shit tier.
- zeroclip 4y agoSign in with private/public keypair instead of Google auth or per-site auth is a pretty incredible advancement of authentication on the web. IPFS does not need to be single drive. The user has the option to self host. The original platform also can go insolvent and the user can pin through another service.
- mccorrinall 4y agoCheck out webauthn, it’s awesome!