3 ms·
> [0] This is also why civil torts are almost always strict-liability. If everything required intent, corporations would be above the law. because of the lack
by nullc 4y ago
> [0] This is also why civil torts are almost always strict-liability. If everything required intent, corporations would be above the law.
because of the lack of investigatory powers (e.g. can't seize their documents, wiretap their communications, search their facilities, etc.) civil cases could generally never work against anyone if they had to show intent. If you get a judgement against you for a civil matter that requires intent you have really screwed up.
- kmeisthax 4y agoThe thing I was pointing towards was more that businesses are very, very good at making torts look accidental, because corporations are fundamentally emotionless. But the limited investigative powers afforded to civil torts are also a really, really big hurdle to proving intent.