One way I try to solve that problem in Rust: use repeated `let thing = simple.invocation();`. No need to rename the variable `thing` if not neccessary. Rust all

One way I try to solve that problem in Rust: use repeated `let thing = simple.invocation();`. No need to rename the variable `thing` if not neccessary. Rust allows redefining a variable with the same name. Additionally I sometimes give the thing a type which makes it even more explicit. Something like this: let thing: Thing = source.prepare(); let thing = thing.make_iterator(); let (first, second) = thing.split(); let first = first.filter(); let second = second.reverse(); let items: Vec<Item> = first.join(second); Just to give an idea how to make a complicated ritual explicit and simple. This simplifies debugging too. You can set a breakpoint and view the variables or you can use println!.