> This is literally not what is happening in the real world though. Give it time. You know what happened with GCC on the NeXT computer; the only reason the Ne

> This is literally not what is happening in the real world though. Give it time. You know what happened with GCC on the NeXT computer; the only reason the NeXT compiler became free is because NeXT had to release it, since they based it on GCC. > There has been no uptake of GCC for this role since it's inception. We both know why. We do not. I was under the impression that the GCC stance on modularity has mellowed in recent times. > using LLVM is made i would prefer that over a fully custom compiler. False dichotomy. I would prefer GCC.