5 ms·
Livestock takes up nearly 80% of global agricultural land, yet produces less than 20% of the world’s supply of calories. See the source for a list of nations wi
by Bakary 4y ago
Livestock takes up nearly 80% of global agricultural land, yet produces less than 20% of the world’s supply of calories. See the source for a list of nations with globally unsustainable diets in terms of land.
https://ourworldindata.org/agricultural-land-by-global-diets https://ourworldindata.org/agricultural-land-by-global-diets
36% of crops globally are used for animal feed. This climbs to 67% in the USA.
https://www.vox.com/2014/8/21/6053187/cropland-map-food-fuel-animal-feed https://www.vox.com/2014/8/21/6053187/cropland-map-food-fuel...
- maximus-decimus 4y agoMeasuring food production by calories feels like measuring programmer productivity by lines of code. How does it compare to other sources of proteins with full amino acid profiles?
- pittmajp 4y agoIrrelevant. You can get a full amino acid profile by combining plant based sources. It is basic high school biology that there’s less energy available the higher up on the food pyramid you go. Farming Lions for meat would be less economical than farming cows. Farming cows is less economical than farming wheat.
- maximus-decimus 4y ago> You can get a full amino acid profile by combining plant based sources. Well, yeah, that's why I'm asking how meat compares to those rather than pure calories sources like corn or sugar cane.
- stickfigure 4y agoThese numbers don't really translate to meaningful information. Livestock eats bulk commodities like corn and grain, which modern mechanized farming has made incredibly efficient. Those staples are grown in regions that don't require irrigation (iowa, kansas, etc). Wheat and corn are already so cheap that they're almost free in the US. Humans get their fill. It's not like little Johnny can't have broccoli this week because the fat cats are eating burgers. Look at it from this perspective: Shipping corn and wheat is a relatively efficient way of moving "water" from places that rain a lot to places where it doesn't.
- forgetfreeman 4y agoGiven the frequency with which livestock is grazed on land that is utterly unsuitable for any other agricultural purpose that 80% is substantially less meaningful than it may appear at first glance.