4 ms·
I agree with you, but imagine being a discriminatory, but rational asshole. Of course you're not going to hire a woman if you could hire a man - they might get
by ThePadawan 4y ago
I agree with you, but imagine being a discriminatory, but rational asshole.
Of course you're not going to hire a woman if you could hire a man - they might get pregnant and be away from work for a long time.
Of course you're not going hire an older employee that knows their worth over a recent graduate that isn't familiar with the salary they should earn. You can rip them off much more easily.
People can be cunts but still act with some rational motivation. That's why we have protected categories, to make sure that that isn't a strategy worth pursuing.
- w4ffl35 4y ago> not going hire an older employee that knows their worth over a recent graduate that isn't familiar with the salary they should earn that's the real problem, self and situational-awareness.
- whiddershins 4y agoExcept if the more experienced engineer is actually worth more, the rational actor will pay them more.
- w4ffl35 4y ago> the rational actor i like the points in this thread. perhaps aging is just a natural bad actor filter. options narrow as we wise up.