I wanted to thank you for this interaction because I've learned quite a bit about the boundary layer on copyright. I think I see what you're saying in this topi

I wanted to thank you for this interaction because I've learned quite a bit about the boundary layer on copyright. I think I see what you're saying in this topic. It looks like the copyright office is perfectly willing to grant copyright on work that uses an AI generator for even a substantial portion of it (https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/09/artist-receives-first-known-us-copyright-registration-for-generative-ai-art https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/09/artis...) but not the whole thing. I suspect there will be a series of cases in the not too distant future to make the boundary line clearer.