5 ms·
>IBM who brought it’s [ sic ] AIX This is misleading at best. AIX didn't exist for IBM to purchase. IBM collaborated with Interactive Systems Corporation unde
by Maursault 4y ago
>IBM who brought it’s [ sic ] AIX
This is misleading at best.
AIX didn't exist for IBM to purchase. IBM collaborated with Interactive Systems Corporation under contract to develop AIX in 1985 and released AIX Version 1 in 1986. IBM collaborated with Locus Computing Corporation, again under contract, to release Version 2 in 1992. Since the mid-1980's, IBM has poured massive development into AIX, which got so stable and feature-rich that when IBM tried to switch to Linux prematurely in 2005, its customers' and their systems administrators complained until IBM's Linux deployment was shelved for nearly a decade in deference to AIX (5, 6 & 7), and never really went away; AIX is still under active development.
- macksd 4y ago"Brought" is the past tense tense of "bring", not "buy". I think you're missing the 'r' when you read that.
- Maursault 4y agomissed the r. Aren't I illiterate?
- macksd 4y agoSome would miss another and say "ain't" :)
- classichasclass 4y agoStill a great history though.
- dosman33 4y agoHeh, yea I was sorely disappointed when I switched from primarily admining AIX to Linux for work. While I had played with Linux long before I got started with AIX, I had only ever used it on desktop workstations and such. Lots of things like ethernet channel bonding that worked fine out of the box on AIX took endless hours of fiddling to get it to sort of work under Linux.
- guenthert 4y agoHmmh? It's pretty well documented in Documentation/networking/bonding.txt in the Linux kernel source tree I thought. I needed our Linux boxes to do bonding somewhere in the 2011-2012 time frame. I don't recall much of a headache. (edit: I misremembered the project/time frame)
- classichasclass 4y agoAs an AIX admin since 3.2.5 and someone who personally owns AIX hardware, when it comes to device support in AIX it either works perfectly or not at all.
- mcguire 4y agoSMIT :-)
- Maursault 4y agoYou were not remotely alone. Dissatisfaction with Linux by professionals at the time (surrounding 2005) was more than enough to counter Linux's growing popularity, verve and momentum. Hard to believe that they actually caused Big Blue to act immediately and stop their premature global Linux deployment and their massive Linux marketing campaign cold. This proved to me, at least, that IBM was still alive, and did, in fact, if surprisingly, listen to their customers.