5 ms·
> It 0-shotted (no other training examples required) it straight out of the box. It 0-shotted it... but incorrectly, right? Gloober Zoo flomps gloober Bat on
by tveita 4y ago
> It 0-shotted (no other training examples required) it straight out of the box.
It 0-shotted it... but incorrectly, right?
Gloober Zoo flomps gloober Bat on turn 1. Gloober Bat flomps gloober Blue on turn 2.
Answering '4' seems like a total guess, maybe based on there being four steps, or 'Blue' being mentioned in step 4.
The replies to your post seem to assume that the answer is correct, but it is actually demonstrating a lack of step-wise reasoning.
- londons_explore 4y agoI think you and OP have a different definition of [subject verb object]... My reading is that on line 1, no action happens, because Roy isn't yellow.
- HL33tibCe7 4y ago> If gloober Zoo is the only gloober that is yellow
- tveita 4y agoThe order seems clear to me: "If a yellow gloober flomps a blue gloober then the blue gloober turns yellow," I still don't see how 4 could be a correct answer, could you post a plausible sequence of turns where Blue turns yellow on turn 4?
- londons_explore 4y agoList of yellow gloobers after each turn. 1. Zoo 2. Zoo, Bat, Crystal 3. Zoo, Bat, Crystal, X-Ray 4. Zoo, Bat, Crystal, X-Ray, Blue
- tveita 4y agoThe text says "Every turn each gloober flomps the same gloobers." If I understand you correctly, you are applying only one of the steps each turn, in order, which contradicts the instructions by flomping different gloobers each turn. It is also guessable in multiple ways which is unfortunate. "There are four steps specified so I guess it happens on turn four." is one invalid way of getting the same answer.
- LodeOfCode 4y agoTo me the numbers imply the steps are sequential, so I'd say the answer is actually turn 1