3 ms·
> Dang claims that users flagged it and linked to the FAQ. I am not defending dang, but that does appear to be a weaponized tactic being utilized here on HN.
by OrvalWintermute 4y ago
> Dang claims that users flagged it and linked to the FAQ.
I am not defending dang, but that does appear to be a weaponized tactic being utilized here on HN.
Flag something, downvote it en masse, get a user making a dissenting opinion on a "you are commenting too fast timer" which appears to be triggered by mass downvotes, and then hope the flagging carries through.
The problem is with HN - they are permitting this type of behavior, and not realizing (or not actively intercepting) the use of this tactic to silence dissent.
While some time ago the idea that IV injection was problematic with the vaccines would be called fringe or, more aptly, cutting edge research, nowadays we know there is a legitimate issue, many countries are now banning these vaccines in persons under specific ages, and the body of research is more developed.
- fakethenews2022 4y agoThe paper was published in Oxford Academic by Oxford University Press. I don't think that can be labeled as fringe. I talked to someone else and apparently this side effect was widely known and accepted in another country far before it was accepted in the US. The dismissal of facts also happened with the investigation of airborne transmission of covid-19.