3 ms·
> The tricky part would be combing through the 160 exabytes of output to find the cycle I don't think you get to leave that out of the O(?) of this problem
by fsckboy 4y ago
> The tricky part would be combing through the 160 exabytes of output to find the cycle
I don't think you get to leave that out of the O(?) of this problem
- Retr0id 4y agoYou can, since there are cycle detection algorithms that do not increase the big-O complexity at all (constant factor).